Palabras clave
Educación
Dental
Anatomía
Tecnología educativa
Autoeficacia
Cómo citar
Resumen
Objectives: To evaluate dental students' perceptions of learning, self-efficacy, and limitations when using three different anatomical study tools: 3D printed models, 2D visualizations, and 3D visualizations in the study of the sphenoid bone.
Materials and Methods: A descriptive methodology was employed with 38 dental students from an Anatomy I course. Participants were randomly assigned to use one of the three study tools. Data was collected through a validated survey assessing satisfaction with learning, self-efficacy, and perceived limitations. Statistical analysis included Pearson's correlation coefficient to explore associations between variables.
Results: Students showed higher satisfaction and self-efficacy with 3D printed models and 3D visualizations compared to 2D images. However, 2D images were perceived as more manageable, likely due to anatomical labels. A moderate positive correlation was found between satisfaction and self-efficacy (r = 0.576, p < 0.001). No significant correlations were observed between perceived limitations and academic performance.
Conclusions: The integration of 3D technologies in anatomical education enhances student satisfaction and perceived self-efficacy. However, the accessibility and cost of 3D printed models present challenges for widespread adoption. Future educational strategies should consider 3D visualizations with digital labeling to optimize learning experiences.
Referencias
Jeon S, Yoon HI, Lee JH, Yeo ISL, Han JS. Complete mouth rehabilitation with fixed implant-supported prosthesis using temporary denture and dental CAD-CAM. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2022;60(1).
Bartikian M, Ferreira A, Gonçalves-Ferreira A, Neto LL. 3D printing anatomical models of head bones. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019;41(10).
Pillai S, Upadhyay A, Khayambashi P, Farooq I, Sabri H, Tarar M, et al. Dental 3d-printing: Transferring art from the laboratories to the clinics. Polymers. 2021;13.
Ifenthaler D, Yau JYK. Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: a systematic review. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2020;68(4).
Rouviere H, Delmar A. Anatomia ROUVIERE TOMO1.PDF. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2005;6(11):951-952.
Tanner JA, Jethwa B, Jackson J, Bartanuszova M, King TS, Bhattacharya A, et al. A Three-Dimensional Print Model of the Pterygopalatine Fossa Significantly Enhances the Learning Experience. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(5).
Chytas D, Johnson EO, Piagkou M, Tsakotos G, Babis GC, Nikolaou VS, et al. Three-dimensional printing in anatomy teaching: current evidence. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42.
Smith CF, Tollemache N, Covill D, Johnston M. Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(1).
Cai B, Rajendran K, Bay BH, Lee J, Yen CC. The Effects of a Functional Three-dimensional (3D) Printed Knee Joint Simulator in Improving Anatomical Spatial Knowledge. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(6).
Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Dumont AS, Tubbs RS. A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation. Clin Anat. 2021;34.9.
Cai B, Rajendran K, Bay BH, Lee J, Yen CC. The Effects of a Functional Three-dimensional (3D) Printed Knee Joint Simulator in Improving Anatomical Spatial Knowledge. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(6).
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2026 Applied Sciences in Dentistry